The following was written by my friend Patrick Cruikshank, Underwriting Manager, Specialty Risk – Professional Liability at Northbridge Insurance in Toronto. Thanks to Patrick for his contribution. Relevant articles are always welcome for publication.
In the 2012 case of Jones v. Tsige, the Ontario Court of Appeal established the new tort of invasion of privacy. For some, this privacy tort has opened a Pandora’s Box. For others, it’s considered legal progress in the modern technological world.
Sandra Jones and Winnie Tsige were employees of the Bank of Montreal (BMO). They worked at different branches and did not know each other. Tsige was in an intimate relationship with Jones’ ex-husband.
Over a period of 4 years, Tsige used her workplace computer to gain access to Jones’ personally identifiable information and personal financial information 174 times. Tsige did not disseminate this information.
When Jones discovered this unauthorized access, she made a formal complaint to her employer, who upon investigation determined that Tsige had accessed Jones’ information and had no legitimate reason to do so. Jones subsequently sued Tsige for invasion of privacy and breach of fiduciary duty. She sought $70,000 in general damages plus $20,000 in punitive damages.
Jones’ claim was dismissed by the Ontario Superior Court because there was no law in Ontario that recognized an invasion of privacy tort.
The Court of Appeal overturned the decision and granted summary judgment in favor of Jones.