Remember the good ol’ days of the Commodore 64, back when fluorescent colors were fashionable and “Computer, earl grey…hot” was to boldly go where no one has gone before?
Well, those days are now behind us, and unless you’re one of the stubborn few who still use a phone line to dial into “those newfangled internets”, you have probably heard of Google’s new search by site application, “Google Goggles”.
On Monday, Google announced the launch of a new search engine that allows users to perform an internet search simply by submitting a photograph. Instead of using words, you can take a picture of an object with your camera phone: Google will attempt to recognize the object, and return relevant search results to you. The experimental search-by-sight feature, called Google Goggles, has a database of billions of images that informs its analysis of what’s been uploaded. Vic Gondotra, Google’s vice president of engineering, has said: “It is our goal to be able to identify any image. It represents our earliest efforts in the field of computer vision. You can take a picture of an item, use that picture of whatever you take as the query.” The application is still in a very early stage of development, however, and works best with objects, books, album covers, artwork, landmarks, places, and logos. You can view Google’s video of the application below:
What this author finds particularly chilling is the fact that this service has the potential to perform instant facial recognition. “Although the service can recognize faces, since faces are among the billions of images in the database, it doesn’t right now,” Gundotra told CNET.com. “For this product, we made the decision not to do facial recognition. We still want to work on the issues of user opt-in and control. We have the technology to do the underlying face recognition, but we decided to delay that until safeguards are in place.”
Wait a second…I think I saw this movie! The legal and privacy ramifications of such an application are, well…eye boggling. Consider, for a moment, the amount of information people freely post on social networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace and Bebo. I had remarked in an earlier post that a fully filled-out Facebook profile contains over forty pieces of recognizably personal information, including name; birthday; educational and employment history; online and offline contact information; sex; sexual preference and relationship status; political and religious views; favorite movies, books and music, and of course, pictures. Facebook is the largest photo-sharing application on the web with more than fourteen million photos uploaded daily. Facebook further offers multiple tools for users to search out and add potential contacts. In completing a typical Facebook profile, a person will have created a comprehensive database of information about both who they are and who they know. This is, for the most part, information that our laws treat as highly private. Now consider that a stranger in a bar could simply snap your photograph and immediately tap into all of this information. Anonymity, privacy, would be a thing of the past: anyone could know everything about you with the click of a cell phone camera.
Indiscriminate advertising could also become a thing of the past. As you walk down the street, cameras could identify who you are, what brand of clothing you are wearing, what you have purchased, evaluate your online data, access your personal preferences and assess your internet browsing habits in order to project video ads that are specifically targeted at you. Of course, the type of customer service you receive might also depend on what the sales clerk reads about you as you walk into a store. We may have progressed well beyond 1980s technology, but in some respects, we could also be heading towards Orwell’s 1984; except that everyone is watching, not just Big Brother.
If you are interested in sampling a further taste of technology that is just around the around the corner, have a look at the clip below on “sixth sense” technology that is currently being developed by researchers at MIT – it is truly fascinating. (The beginning of the clip is a bit slow, so if you are in a hurry, forward the film to 2:30 where Pattie Maes starts to demonstrate the device.)
4 Responses to “I Spy With My Little Eye, Some Pending Privacy Issues: “Google Goggles””
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






December 10th, 2009 at 12:09 am
I had heard about this! It is cool, eh? The facial recognition thing is kinda funny. Have you tried using Picassa for uploading photos? It can figure out where the faces are in the photograph, and it tries to match them up to faces in other photos and recognize them automatically. It will offer a face and let you select who it is. It then will give the option to see “all pictures of …” The tech still needs work, though. It hasn’t been able to get my picture right once, although it was able to identify a few other people dead on several times. I’ll bet once the tech gets a bit better, they will be able to find a person not only by their face, but by matching to other people in the photos and the locations where the photographs are taken. “They” know who your friends are from the networking sites, know who you are from your computer IP and can recognize where you’ve been from photos that you post. It’s pretty creepy.
On the other hand, when tech gets to the point that you can put on glasses and a virtual screen will be there in front of you while you walk… then you could look up the stats on everyone that you bump into. You could find out who to avoid, or you could also find out about some of their hobbies, and have something to discuss other than the weather. Hah! Maybe you could have a rating system; when you look around a room, you’ll see a rated number over people’s heads… oh! He’s a 5 star guy in all my chosen categories!! I’ll go dance with him!!
December 10th, 2009 at 9:23 am
Interesting! I suppose those on the leading edge always bear the brunt of the criticism, as well as the glory. As with other privacy concerns, I imagine the pundits will clamour on about how if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.
Another website, [http://www.tineye.com/], has been doing something along the lines of reverse image search for a while. While they don’t identify image contents as Google proposes, they do attempt to find related images that have been cropped, edited or resized.
As for targetted advertising, I imagine most of us will simply learn to ignore it just as we do today with non-targetted ads of all types. Advertising has already gotten much better than it used to be through media ‘science’: Focus groups, branding, psychology of inadequacy, etc. We’ll soon tune out the targetted ads as well, though they are sure to be effective for a while.
December 10th, 2009 at 2:46 pm
Surveillance by numbers
Research by Matt Kennard
20 – per cent of all the world’s CCTV cameras are in the UK
300 – number of times a day the average Londoner is caught on CCTV
1 – UK’s position in the global league table for ratio of CCTV cameras to people
12 – number of people per CCTV camera in Britain
0 – percentage improvement in police detection rates of violent offences with CCTV
I stopped being worried about facial recognition and ‘big brother’ a long time ago. I would be more concerned about what the state was doing with the information than I would someone using a phone to do facial recognition. The state record their stuff and who knows what they do with it. At least on a phone there is a limit to space. This is actually some pretty cool stuff.
December 11th, 2009 at 3:05 pm
[...] I Spy With My Little Eye, Some Pending Privacy Issues: “Google Goggles” [...]